论文部分内容阅读
选取乐山职业技术学院附属医院收治的GDM98例,随机分为观察组和对照组各49例。对照组采用传统健康宣教方式,观察组采用健康教育临床路径实施健康宣教。采用健康教育知识调查问卷评估两组患者对健康教育知识的掌握情况并进行对比,同时对比两组患者健康教育前后空腹血糖、餐后2小时血糖的变化情况。结果:观察组饮食运动方法的掌握率为93.88%,药物使用方法的掌握率为73.47%,血糖监测方法的掌握率为89.80%,低血糖症状及处理方法的掌握率为95.92%均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者健康教育后的空腹血糖、餐后2小时血糖均显著低于健康教育前(均P<0.05);观察组血糖均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:健康教育临床路径的实施可显著提高GDM患者对健康教育知识的掌握效果,提高本病的临床治疗效果。
Select GMS 98 cases admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Leshan Polytechnic, were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 49 cases each. The control group adopted the traditional health education methods, and the observation group used the clinical education of health education to implement the health education. Health education knowledge questionnaire was used to evaluate the mastery of health education knowledge between the two groups and to compare the changes of fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose 2 hours before and after health education. Results: The mastery rate of diet movement was 93.88% in the observation group, 73.47% in the drug use method, 89.80% in the blood sugar monitoring method, and 95.92% in the hypoglycemia symptom and treatment method (P <0.05). The fasting blood glucose and postprandial 2-hour postprandial blood glucose of the two groups were significantly lower than those before health education (all P <0.05). The blood glucose of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The implementation of health education clinical pathway can significantly improve the mastery effect of GDM knowledge on health education and improve the clinical curative effect of this disease.