论文部分内容阅读
2014年重庆市高考物理卷总体符合新课程理念,体现了评价的科学性,符合课标和考纲的要求.但作为“压轴选择题”的第5题并没有起到区分与甄别作用,不具有选拔功能,不利于促进基础教育发展与高校人才的选拔,会对教师在高中物理选择题教学过程中对试题难度因素的判断产生不良影响.2014年重庆市理综物理试卷第5题:以不同速度将两个物体同时竖直向上抛出并开始计时,一个物体所受空气阻力可忽
In 2014, the physical volumes of college entrance examination in Chongqing generally conformed to the concept of new curriculum, reflecting the scientific nature of evaluation and meeting the requirements of course standard and syllabus.However, the fifth question of “Fist Choice” did not distinguish and discriminate, Does not have the function of selection, is not conducive to promoting the development of basic education and the selection of university talent, teachers will be high school physics in the teaching of multiple choice questions on the difficulty of judging the factors that have a negative impact on the 2014 Chongqing physical fitness papers fifth question: At different speeds, the two objects are simultaneously thrown up and up at the same time. The air resistance of an object can be neglected