论文部分内容阅读
同行审稿是保障期刊学术质量的重要环节,但同行专家审稿积极性不高、拒绝审稿、勉强审稿已成为普遍现象。如何提高审稿专家的积极性,是学术期刊亟待解决的共性问题。文章以《中国天然药物》编辑部近年来约请审稿人的实践心得为基础,讨论提高专家审稿积极性的措施:选择潜在作者群作为审稿专家,避免过量送审,加大初审退稿率,尊重审稿专家的要求,与无反馈的审稿专家取得联系,利用ORCID认可审稿专家的贡献等,旨在致力于提高专家的审稿同意率,从而在源头上推动期刊的发展。
Peer review is an important part of ensuring the academic quality of journals. However, the enthusiasm of peer reviewers is not high, and it is a common phenomenon that the manuscript examination is rejected without permission. How to improve the enthusiasm of reviewer experts is a common problem to be solved in academic journals. Based on the practical experience of inviting reviewers in recent years, the editorial department of “China Natural Medicine” discusses the measures to improve the enthusiasm of experts in reviewing manuscripts: selecting potential authors as reviewers, avoiding excessive submitting trial, increasing the rejection rate of first instance, Respect for the requirements of reviewers, get in touch with non-feedback reviewers, and make use of ORCID’s recognition of reviewers ’contributions, aiming at improving the rate of experts’ approval of reviewers and promoting the development of journals at the source.