论文部分内容阅读
目的评价急诊床旁超声eFAST方案在严重多发伤患者中的应用效果。方法选取符合纳入标准的严重多发伤患者，在采取必要医疗干预措施的同时行CT和急诊床旁超声eFAST方案，记录检查耗时、超声诊断结果、CT扫描结果。结果 eFAST方案比CT检查时间短，两者比较有显著性差异(<0.05)。eFAST方案的敏感性为87.4%，特异性为95.1%，准确性为90.2%。结论急诊床旁超声eFAST方案耗时短，患者无需转运，具有较好的敏感性、特异性、准确性，是评估严重多发伤患者的有效方法。“,”Objective To evaluate the clinical ef ect of emergency bedside ultrasound eFAST regimen in patients with severe multiple injuries. Methods Selection of patients with severe multiple trauma into standard, In taking the necessary medical interventions and CT and eFAST scheme of emergency bedside ultrasound, Record the examination time, ultrasound diagnosis results, the results of CT scan.Results The eFAST scheme than CT examination time is short, both had significant dif erence (P<0.05). The sensitivity of eFAST solution was 87.4%, the specificity was 95.1%, the accuracy was 90.2%.Conclusion eFAST scheme of emergency bedside ultrasound in patients with short time-consuming, without transport, with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and good, are useful for evaluating patients with severe multiple trauma.