论文部分内容阅读
自辩证法和形而上学产生以来,二者的关系就备受学界关注,但大多是关于二者相对立的研究,对其同一性研究少之又少。在人类思维的历史演变过程中,它们作为两种完全不同的思维方式,各自认识世界的出发点和方法也存在差异,人们普遍认为辩证思维比形而上学思维要先进,全盘否定形而上学思维的作用。当然,目前用形而上学的单向性思维方式来思考、看待、解决问题的现象依旧存在,这就要求我们必须正确认识辩证法与形而上学的关系,本文主要从思维方式入手来探讨二者的关系,从而为更好理解哲学史奠定基础。
Since dialectics and metaphysics came into being, the relationship between the two has drawn much attention from the academic circles, but most of the studies on the relative contradiction between the two have little research on their identity. In the historical evolution of human thinking, they are two completely different ways of thinking, and their starting points and methods of understanding each other are different. People generally think that dialectical thinking should be advanced than metaphysical thinking and totally negate the role of metaphysical thinking. Of course, at present, the phenomenon of thinking, seeing and solving problems still exists in metaphysics one-way thinking, which requires that we must correctly understand the relationship between dialectics and metaphysics. This article mainly discusses the relationship between the two by starting with the way of thinking To better understand the history of philosophy laid the foundation.