论文部分内容阅读
目的评价不同部位手术切口白内障超声乳化吸除非折叠式人工晶体植入术的方法和临床疗效。方法对110例(110眼)白内障患者,随机分A、B、C3组行白内障超声乳化非折叠式人工晶体植入术,其中A组38眼为上方巩膜隧道切口,B组44眼为上方角巩膜缘切口,C组28眼为上方透明角膜切口。并于术后第1天、1周、1个月、3个月观察术后裸眼视力、角膜散光及手术并发症发生情况。结果3组术后近期及远期裸眼视力无显著差异。A组、B组术后散光无显著差异。C组术后散光最大,有统计学意义,其术后并发症多。结论巩膜隧道切口、角巩膜缘切口优于透明角膜切口,安全可靠。
Objective To evaluate the method and clinical efficacy of phacoemulsification and non-foldable intraocular lens implantation in different surgical sites. Methods 110 cases (110 eyes) of cataract patients were randomly divided into groups A, B and C3 underwent cataract phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation. Group A (38 eyes) was the upper scleral tunnel incision (Group B, 44 eyes) Scleral marginal incision, C group 28 eyes above the clear corneal incision. Visual acuity, corneal astigmatism and complications of operation were observed on the first day, one week, one month and three months after operation. Results There were no significant differences in visual acuity between the two groups in the short and long term. A group, B group postoperative astigmatism no significant difference. C group astigmatism after surgery the largest, statistically significant, and its postoperative complications. Conclusion Scleral tunnel incision, corneal limbal incision better than clear corneal incision, safe and reliable.