硫酸吗啡栓治疗中重度癌痛的临床疗效与安全性研究

来源 :药物不良反应杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:trulyliu
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨硫酸吗啡栓治疗中重度癌痛的临床疗效与安全性。方法:采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验方法。2005年3月至2006年3月期间中重度癌痛患者132例纳入研究。患者分为2组:治疗组(66例)和对照组(66例)。治疗组中男35例,女31例,平均年龄(52.8±11.9)岁,对照组中男46例,女20例,平均年龄(58.2±10.9)岁。治疗组患者经肛门给予硫酸吗啡栓(20mg)1枚和口服安慰剂1片,对照组患者口服硫酸吗啡片(20mg)1片和经肛门给予安慰剂栓1枚。待患者再出现中度疼痛时,再第2次给药。每日用药剂量不超过100mg,共给药7d。评价硫酸吗啡栓的镇痛效果和不良反应。结果:治疗组和对照组用药前用目测划线分级法测定的疼痛强度分别为7.1±1.3和6.8±1.2,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者用药后15、30min及1.0、1.5、2.0、3.0、4.0、6.0h的疼痛强度均较用药前下降。用药前疼痛强度和用药后各时间点疼痛强度的差值如下:第1次用药后,治疗组分别为0.80±1.33、2.09±1.77、3.27±1.92、4.14±2.05、4.26±2.13、3.70±2.09、3.27±2.11及2.88±2.35,对照组分别为0.74±1.41、1.97±1.93、3.15±2.11、3.82±2.16、3.95±2.13、3.52±2.12、3.00±2.19及2.70±2.23;第2次用药后,治疗组分别为0.92±1.37、5.35±1.53、3.05±1.94、3.38±1.85、3.70±2.02、3.52±2.00、3.05±2.06及2.84±2.22、,对照组分别为0.72±1.03、4.95±1.49、2.77±1.84、3.27±1.98、3.27±1.95、3.05±1.77、2.67±1.68及2.25±1.88。2组用药前后疼痛强度的差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001),但2组间疼痛强度的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗组和对照组第1次用药后2h镇痛的有效率均为71.21%,疼痛强度分别为2.74与2.86,用药后6h疼痛强度均为4.12;治疗组与对照组第2~7天用药次数分别为2.54~2.97与2.52~3.03。2组用药后2h和6h的有效率、疼痛强度及用药次数比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。2组不良反应发生率均为27.27%。治疗组和对照组的主要不良反应分别为呕吐(13.64%与9.09%),恶心(10.61%与10.61%),便秘(6.06%和7.58%),嗜睡(3.03%与6.06%),头晕(3.03%与6.06%),皮肤瘙痒(1.52%与1.52%),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其中治疗组发生复视1.52%,肛门下坠1.52%;对照组发生呼吸抑制1.52%,指尖抽搐1.52%。结论:硫酸吗啡栓对癌痛的镇痛效果与硫酸吗啡片相似,是一种安全有效能良好耐受的治疗中重度癌痛的剂型。 Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of morphine sulfate suppository in the treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was used. From March 2005 to March 2006, 132 patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: treatment group (66 cases) and control group (66 cases). In the treatment group, there were 35 males and 31 females with an average age of (52.8±11.9) years. In the control group, there were 46 males and 20 females with a mean age of (58.2±10.9) years. Patients in the treatment group were given analmorphine sulphate suppository (20 mg) and oral placebo 1 via the anus, and patients in the control group were given one tablet of morphine sulphate (20 mg) orally and 1 placebo suppository. When the patient reappears moderate pain, the second dose is given. Daily dose of not more than 100mg, a total of 7d. The analgesic effect and adverse reactions of morphine sulfate suppositories were evaluated. Results: The pain intensity of the treatment group and the control group before and after the treatment by the visual scoring stratification method was 7.1±1.3 and 6.8±1.2, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The pain intensity at the 15th, 30th, and 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 6.0 h after treatment in both groups was lower than before the medication. The differences in pain intensity and pain intensity at each time point after administration were as follows: After the first administration, the treatment groups were 0.80±1.33, 2.09±1.77, 3.27±1.92, 4.14±2.05, 4.26±2.13, 3.70±2.09, respectively. , 3.27±2.11 and 2.88±2.35, and the control group were 0.74±1.41, 1.97±1.93, 3.15±2.11, 3.82±2.16, 3.95±2.13, 3.52±2.12, 3.00±2.19 and 2.70±2.23, respectively; after the second medication The treatment group was 0.92±1.37, 5.35±1.53, 3.05±1.94, 3.38±1.85, 3.70±2.02, 3.52±2.00, 3.05±2.06, and 2.84±2.22, respectively, and the control group was 0.72±1.03, 4.95±1.49, respectively. 2.77±1.84, 3.27±1.98, 3.27±1.95, 3.05±1.77, 2.67±1.68 and 2.25±1.88. Differences in pain intensity before and after treatment in the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.001), but pain intensity between the two groups was significant. The difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The effective rate of analgesia was 71.21%, pain intensity was 2.74 and 2.86, and the pain intensity was 4.12 at 6 hours after treatment in the treatment group and the control group at the 2nd hour after the first medication. The treatment time was between 2 to 7 days in the treatment and control groups. They were 2.54-2.97 and 2.52-3.03, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy, pain intensity, and number of medications at 2h and 6h after treatment in the 2 groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was 27.27%. The main adverse reactions in the treatment group and control group were vomiting (13.64% and 9.09%), nausea (10.61% and 10.61%), constipation (6.06% and 7.58%), drowsiness (3.03% and 6.06%), dizziness (3.03) % and 6.06%), skin pruritus (1.52% and 1.52%), there was no significant difference between the groups (P> 0.05), in which treatment group had double vision 1.52%, anus fell 1.52%; control group respiratory depression 1.52 %, Fingertip convulsions 1.52%. Conclusion: The analgesic effect of morphine sulfate suppository on cancer pain is similar to that of morphine sulfate tablets. It is a safe and effective, well-tolerated treatment for moderate to severe cancer pain.
其他文献
脂联素是脂肪细胞分泌的一种生物活性分子,是一种蛋白质激素,与代谢综合征、糖尿病、IgA肾病、肾移植、肥胖相关肿瘤等疾病有关,本文对脂联素与肾脏疾病的关系作一综述.
目的 探讨脑挫裂伤后CT扫描征象中环池、中脑受压程度与患者意识和预后的关系.方法 回顾分析1999年2月至2006年6月临床和CT资料完整的脑挫裂伤患者169例,依据伤后首次CT扫描
目的 通过MRI影像解剖学方法研究锁骨骨折手术安全性分区. 方法用核磁共振对13例志愿者锁骨邻近结构进行矢状位和冠状位图像采集.分别测量锁骨下静脉、臂丛神经束移行至锁骨下方时在锁骨投影A点和B点至胸锁关节的距离,以确定具体位置.同时测量钻孔安全深度和安全角度. 结果 A点对应的体表标志为锁骨中内1/3交点(M点);B点对应的体表标志为锁骨全长中点(N点).将锁骨依据手术安全性分区进行如下划分,Ⅰ区
在市场经济逐步发展与社会不断进步下,企业所面临的竞争环境更加复杂,同时市场竞争也更为激烈。经济管理是企业在激烈的市场竞争中立于不败之地的基础,而成本核算是企业经济
长期以来,科研经费管理失范是高校及社会各界高度关注的重大问题。探索并寻求提高科研经费管理水平的方法及途径成为高职院校迫切需要解决的问题。本文深入剖析了高职院校科
浅述企业的质量管理需在过程中控制的重要性,在生产加工流程中应全程进行质量的控制,怎样能更好的来提高产品质量。 Shallowly discusses the enterprise quality control n
资产盘存是企业生产经营管理过程中重要的一环,是存货在仓库储存或滞留的过程;企业要落实资产盘存业务的内容、业务环节,做好企业资产盘存业务内部控制制度的分析与设计,实施
教学模式改革创新,是依据创新的教学思想,将教学目标、教学方法、教学形式、教学理念等进行重组构建,从而形成适应学生提高学习效率的新的教学模式。本文基于教学实践中的教学方
针对现用的各种插值法公式冗长、难记、计算过程复杂的缺陷,提出一种顺序插值法。该法在现有插值法计算方法的基础上,运用三角形的相似性对现用算法进行改进。通过研究发现:
本文首先分析了在少数民族村寨文化视觉下探索新农村环境建设的意义,然后从宏观角度阐述了其环境建设的策略,最后较为详细的论述了对少数民族村寨文化视觉下的新农村环境建设的