关于“房屋典当”的争鸣——来稿综述

• 出 处: 人民司法
• 发表日期: 2004年期
• 关键词: 郭斌 典买 户律 盛京户部 清朝时期 质人 借款利息 黑龙江省绥化 清会典 用益物权

本刊去年第六期在《读者论坛》栏中发表了杨洪安同志的《房屋能“典当”吗?》一文后,陆续收到了不少读者的来信,就有关“典当”问题阐述了各自的不同意见。由于版面有限,不能一一发表,现将其中的主要论点综述如下,供大家进一步研究参考。 江西省高级人民法院的读者郭斌认为不应该将房屋典当关系解释为房屋典卖关系,并对“典卖”一词以及“典卖又称活卖”的说法提出异议,其主要理由是:

The sixth issue of last year, published in the column of “Reader's Forum” in the column of “Reader's Forum”, submitted a letter from many readers about “pawn” of “Housing Energy” by Comrade Yang Hongan, and elaborated on their differences in relation to the “pawn” issue opinion. Due to the limited edition, can not be published one by one, the main arguments are summarized below, for your further study and reference. Guo Bin, a reader of the Higher People's Court of Jiangxi Province, believes that the pawn relationship between houses should not be interpreted as the relationship between the pawn sale of houses and the objection to the term “pawn sale” and “pawn sale, also known as live sale”. The main reasons are: