台湾地区民事审级功能改革之实践效果评析

• 作 者: 李亚凝
• 机 构: 厦门大学法学院,
• 出 处: 司法改革论评
• 发表日期: 2012年00期
• 关键词: 审级 民事案件 审理程序 审判活动 言词辩论 司法解决 第三审程序 阐明权 诉讼效率 第一审程序

一、问题的提出20世纪90年代之前,台湾地区民事诉讼审理程序采取并行审理主义,其目的在于使多数案件可以立即同时进行而不必等待。但是随着民事案件日益增多,案情日益复杂,并且绝大多数当事人在言词辩论期日才提出书状,法官常常无法在审理期日内就案件进行深入调查。这就导致了审判活动一再改期,案件

I. PROBLEM PROBLEMS Before the 1990s, the procedure of trial of civil procedure in Taiwan adopted a parallel adjudication doctrine so as to enable the majority of cases to proceed simultaneously and without waiting. However, with the increasing number of civil cases, the increasingly complicated case, and the vast majority of the parties filing pleadings on the date of speeches, judges are often unable to conduct an in-depth investigation of the case during the trial period. This led to trial activities repeatedly rescheduled cases