论文部分内容阅读
2008年3月31日,许霆案重审宣判,许霆盗窃金融机构罪名成立,被判处有期徒刑5年。但是,本案仍有许多值得商榷的地方,其关键在于许霆恶意取款的行为是否构成盗窃行为。本文将重点分析“秘密”与“窃取”的构成要件,指出在本案中,许霆的行为与之并不相符。最后,本文指出,本案的根本缺陷是判决书说理不足,从而严重与直接削弱了该有罪判决的信服力。
On March 31, 2008, Xu Ting retrial verdict, Xu Ting was convicted of theft of financial institutions, was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. However, there are still many open questions in this case. The crux of the matter lies in whether Xu Ting maliciously withdraws money and constitutes a theft. This article will focus on the analysis of the constitutional elements of “secret” and “theft”, pointing out that in this case, Xu Ting did not behave in the same way. Finally, this article points out that the fundamental flaw of this case is that the verdict is not enough to justify the serious and direct weakening of the conviction conviction.