Prediction of blasting mean fragment size using support vector regression combined with five optimiz

• 作 者: Enming Li Fenghao Yang Meiheng Ren Xiliang Zhang Jian Zhou Manoj Khandelwal
• 机 构: School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha,410083,China;Universida
• 出 处: 岩石力学与岩土工程学报（英文版）
• 发表日期: 2021年6期
• 关键词: Blasting mean fragment size e-support vector regression (e-SVR) V-support vector

The main purpose of blasting operation is to produce desired and optimum mean size rock fragments. Smaller or fine fragments cause the loss of ore during loading and transportation, whereas large or coarser fragments need to be further processed, which enhances production cost. Therefore, accurate prediction of rock fragmentation is crucial in blasting operations. Mean fragment size (MFS) is a crucial index that measures the goodness of blasting designs. Over the past decades, various models have been proposed to evaluate and predict blasting fragmentation. Among these models, artificial intelligence (AI)-based models are becoming more popular due to their outstanding prediction results for multi-influential factors. In this study, support vector regression (SVR) techniques are adopted as the basic prediction tools, and five types of optimization algorithms, i.e. grid search (GS), grey wolf optimization (GWO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and salp swarm algorithm (SSA), are implemented to improve the prediction performance and optimize the hyper-parameters. The prediction model involves 19 influential factors that constitute a comprehensive blasting MFS evaluation system based on AI techniques. Among all the models, the GWO-v-SVR-based model shows the best compre-hensive performance in predicting MFS in blasting operation. Three types of mathematical indices, i.e. mean square error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R2) and variance accounted for (VAF), are utilized for evaluating the performance of different prediction models. The R2, MSE and VAF values for the training set are 0.8355, 0.00138 and 80.98, respectively, whereas 0.8353, 0.00348 and 82.41, respectively for the testing set. Finally, sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the influence of input pa-rameters on MFS. It shows that the most sensitive factor in blasting MFS is the uniaxial compressive strength.