论文部分内容阅读
“一本书主义”,如今难得有人提起;“一本书运动”则是本人的杜撰,拿来和各位编辑出版同人讨论。想起还在不更事的少年时代,很是谈“一本书主义”色变的。既因为这是所谓“大右派作家”丁玲的“右派言论”,也因为那时候社会图书出版量很少。我们这个民族,自来是把文章当做千古事,当做经天纬地、经国纬业之事,把白纸黑字看成是铁证如山。其时,某人出版一本书,在普通人眼里那就是惊天动地的传奇故事了。所以,在我这个做着作家梦的少年人私心里,
“One book doctrine” is now rarely mentioned by anyone; “one book movement” is my own fabrication and was discussed with editors and editorial colleagues. Remembered still not a juvenile era, it is to talk about “a book doctrine” changeable. It is because this is the “rightist speech” of Ding Ling, the so-called “big-right writer”, and because at that time social books were published in small quantities. Our nation has always taken the article as a long-standing issue. As a matter of latitude and longitude, it is a matter of latitude and longitude of the country and black and white characters are seen as ironclad evidence. At that time, someone published a book, in the eyes of ordinary people that is earth-shattering legendary story. Therefore, in my selfishness as a writer’s dream,