论文部分内容阅读
《河洛春秋》1989年第一期上发表的《唐东都武则天明堂遗址探索》(以下简称“探索”),及《中国历史地理论丛》1989年第三辑上发表的《唐东都“武则天明堂”遗址质疑》(以下简称“质疑”)两文,对中国社会科学院考古研究所洛阳唐城队1986年发掘的八角形基址为武则天明堂提出疑问,认为明堂应是八角形基址南面的长方形夯土基址。后者并认为八角形基址为天堂遗址。我们不同意这一看法,因此,就有关问题论述如下。
“Heluo Chunqiu” published in the first phase in 1989, “Tang dynasty Wu Zetian Temple site exploration” (hereinafter referred to as “exploration”), and “Chinese history and geography” in 1989 third series published “Tang The eastern capital ”Wu Zetian Mingtang “ site questioned ”(hereinafter referred to as “ questioned ”) two articles on the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Archeology Luoyang Tangcheng team excavated in 1986 octagonal base for Wu Zetian Ming Tang questioned that Ming Tang The base of the rammed earth should be the base of the octagonal base south. The latter also considers the octagonal base site as a paradise site. We do not agree with this view. Therefore, the relevant issues are discussed below.