论文部分内容阅读
不可否认,当前影评确还存在着某种做表面文章和广告文章的现象。比如有的只凭自己看片时的一点感受,匆匆行文,言不及义;有的则是参照宣传资料,人云亦云,尽多溢美之词。如果说影评是一门科学,它的科学性主要表现在实事求是,那么,这种表面化和广告式——不够实事求是的所谓影评文章必然最惹人生厌,是没有生命力的。如何改变这种现象,我看关键还在于提高影评者的自身素养。我国已故著名影评家钟惦(非木)曾多次向影评人提出“七分文化,三分电影”的问题。我理解其用意,也无非是希望影评人都能具有良好的素质和文化修养,都能具有广博的知识,这样才能对电影这门综合的、复杂的艺术发表出比较科学、精辟而又深刻的见解。
It is undeniable that the current film review there is still some sort of superficial and advertising articles. For example, some just look at the film when they feel a little bit, hurry writing, out of justice; others refer to promotional materials, parrot, as many beautiful words. If film criticism is a science and its scientific nature is mainly manifested in seeking truth from facts, then such surface and advertisement-type film criticisms that are not realistic enough will inevitably become the most annoying and inanimate thing. How to change this phenomenon, I think the key is to improve film critics of their own literacy. The famous Chinese film critic Zhong Kuo (non-wood) has repeatedly asked the film critics the question of “seven-part culture and one-third movie”. I understand its intention, it is nothing more than hope critics can have a good quality and cultural accomplishment, can have extensive knowledge, so as to film this comprehensive, complex art published more scientific, insightful and profound opinion.