论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】在有真实经济纠纷的诉讼中,当事人本人实施的伪造证据、虚构事实的诉讼欺诈行为,因其实质上不符合诈骗罪的犯罪特征,刑法也没有将其规定为诈骗罪,同时考虑这类诉讼欺诈行为发生的有因性,故不应将其认定为诈骗罪,而是应对行为人给予民事处罚或者按照其手段行为触犯的其他罪名定罪。■案号一审:(2011)赫刑初字第77号二审:(2011)益法刑二终字第44号重审:(2011)赫刑重字第3号二审:(2011)益法刑二终字第96号
In the real economic dispute litigation, the parties themselves forged evidence, fictitious fact litigation fraud, because it is essentially not in line with the characteristics of the crime of fraud, the criminal law did not make it a crime of fraud, at the same time Considering the causes of such litigation fraud, it should not be considered as fraud, but rather that the perpetrators should be given civil penalties or convicted of other offenses under their own means. ■ Case No. First instance: (2011) He Xun Chu Zi No. 77 Second instance: (2011) Yi Fa Zhu Er Zhong Zi No. 44 retrial: (2011) He Xingzhong Zi No. 3 Second instance: (2011) The final word No. 96