论文部分内容阅读
关于“高考统一命题”的话题甫一提出,就引起了广大读者的热议,但由于版面所限,本期坚持质量第一、趋于平衡的原则,只从中择取若干具有代表性的稿件整理成文。这些稿件,有的为扩大全国统一命题范围“点赞”;有的则为全国统一命题提出质疑,认为“治标不治本”;有的赞同“一纲一卷”;有的倾向“一纲多卷”;有的认为应“各美其美”;有的带着高度的批判精神看待“一纲多卷”;有的则为更具公平性的命题方式改革提出了较好的建议。争论代表着思考,但思考不应止于争论。我们期待更具公平性、客观性、可行性的高考命题政策的出台。
As soon as the topic of “Unified Proposition of College Entrance Examination” was put forward, it aroused the heated discussion among readers. However, due to the restriction of layout, the principle of quality first and balance during the current issue was only selected from a number of representative The manuscript finishing documents. Some of these manuscripts are for expanding the scope of the unified proposition of the whole nation, some for questioning the proposition of a unified nation, and for some as a “temporary solution” Some people think that “beauty and beauty”, “Some take a high degree of critical thinking,” “a multi-volume”; while others are more fair Propositional reform put forward better proposals. Arguments represent thinking, but thinking should not stop in controversy. We look forward to more fair, objectivity, feasibility of the college entrance examination proposition policy.