论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较头孢唑林与头孢呋辛对剖宫产产妇术后预防切口感染的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年1—6月间收治的行剖宫产婴产妇120例临床资料,采用随机单盲法将其分为对照组和观察组(每组60例);对照组产妇给予头孢唑林预防切口感染,观察组产妇则给予头孢呋辛预防切口感染,比较两组产妇用药后切口感染的发生率。结果:两组产妇用药后术前、术后2 d和术后4 d白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞计数(N)、血红蛋白(Hb)测得值经比较其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组产妇术后用药后体温升高的发热率经组间比较其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),住院期间均未出现切口感染。结论:采用头孢唑林预防剖宫产产妇术后切口感染的疗效优于头孢呋辛。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of cefazolin and cefuroxime in the prevention of incision infection after cesarean section. Methods: One hundred and twenty cases of cesarean maternal women admitted from January to June in 2016 were selected and divided into control group and observation group (60 cases in each group) by random single-blind method. In the control group, cefazolin Lin prevention incision infection, observation group maternal cefuroxime was given to prevent incision infection, compared with the incidence of incision infection in the two groups of maternal medication. Results: There were no significant differences in WBC, neutrophil count (N) and hemoglobin (Hb) between the two groups before and 2 days and 4 days after operation P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in fever rates between the two groups after operation (P> 0.05). No incision infection occurred during hospitalization. Conclusion: The efficacy of cefazolin in preventing incision infection after cesarean delivery is better than that of cefuroxime.