论文部分内容阅读
侵占罪与其他财产类型犯罪并没有本质的区别,侵占罪告诉才处理的规定最初是基于保护受害人的角度所做出的,是为了让受害人自身有充分的选择权。但是在当下的司法实践中存在很多问题,受害人往往无法顺利的行使自己的权利,其利益并不能得到较为充分的保护。告诉才处理制度,有其存在的价值,但是对侵占罪受害人的利益保护来说,并不能发挥应有的作用,应该进行一定程度的完善。
Crime of embezzlement is not essentially different from crimes of other types of property. The principle that crime of embezzlement was dealt with was originally based on the protection of the victim, in order to give the victim full choice. However, there are many problems in the current judicial practice. Victims often can not exercise their rights smoothly and their interests can not be fully protected. Told that before the system of handling, there is a value of its existence, but for the protection of the interests of victims of embezzlement, it can not play its due role, and should be improved to some extent.