论文部分内容阅读
目的:探索符合广州地区灾害医学紧急救援需要的医院应急响应机制,研究成果将直接运用于广州地区甚至全国的灾害紧急医学救援,为紧急医学救援的相关决策机构提供科学的数据,对于建立科学的、符合实际的快速紧急医学救援体系具有重要意义。方法:研究对象分为两组:第一小队为值班的医生,护士和司机组成,第二小队由在家待命的各科室的固定人员组成。比较研究在历次演练、突发事件中第一小队和第二小队的人员到齐率、药品装车时间、装备装车时间、从接到调令到出发的时间、所要面对的各种影响出车的意外因素、各自面对的出车环节。结果:第一小队在人员到齐率,药品装箱时间,装备装箱时间,从接到调令到出发的时间上均优于第二小队(P<0.01)。第二小队所面对的出车意外因素较多,出车环节多,耗时长。结论:第一小队的应急响应机制比第二小队优胜,更符合灾害救援的需要。
OBJECTIVE: To explore the hospital emergency response mechanism that meets the emergency medical needs of disaster medicine in Guangzhou. The research results will be directly applied to disaster emergency medical rescue in Guangzhou and even the whole country, to provide scientific data for emergency medical rescue decision-makers and to establish scientific , In line with the actual rapid emergency medical rescue system is of great significance. METHODS: Subjects were divided into two groups: the first team consisted of doctors, nurses and drivers on duty and the second team consisted of permanent staff in various departments at home. Comparative study In the previous exercise, the first team and second team in the emergency personnel to Qi rate, drug loading time, loading and unloading time, from the receipt of the order to the departure time, the impact of a variety of Accidents of the car, the face of each part of the car. Results: The first team was better than the second team (P <0.01) in terms of staff turnover rate, time of packing of medicines, time of loading and packing, and time from receiving the order to departure. The second team to face the accidental factors more out of the car, take part in more time-consuming. Conclusion: The first team’s emergency response mechanism better than the second team, more in line with disaster relief needs.