论文部分内容阅读
“我们的文艺批评落后于创作。”去年六月我省第二次文艺工作者代表会议上,理论批评组的同志几乎一致承认这个事突。党提出“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的方针后,许多人都窃喜:这下理论批评的落后状况要转变了。半年来,贯徹“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的结果,我省创作的欣欣向荣的景象已经露出了苗头;文艺理论研究有了发展;文艺批评虽然也有一些起色,但比较起来仍然是落在后面了。按理说,我们的文艺批评应该更加活跃,文艺批评这枝花应该开放得更茂盛,让它象“满园春色关不住,一枝红杏出墙来”的红杏,给人们透露出春的消息,而不是软弱无力地跟在创作后面。事实上却不然。文艺批评象凤毛麟角,除贵州日报讨论“喜报”比较集中地发表了一些文章
“Our literary critique lags behind the creation.” At the second meeting of literary workers in our province in June last year, the comrades of the theoretical criticism group almost unanimously recognized this issue. After the party proposed the policy of “letting all flowers bloom and all schools contend,” many people are jealous: the backwardness of theoretical criticism has to be changed. In the past six months, with the result of “letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend,” the thriving scene of our province has witnessed signs of development. The development of literary theory has progressed. Although literary criticism has also shown some improvement, it still lags behind. Logically speaking, our literary criticism should be more active, literary criticism of this flower should be more open and more lush, let it be like “the spring of the garden can not be shut off, an affair came out” of the apricot, to reveal the spring The message, not weakly behind the creation. In fact, it is not. As rare as literary criticism, in addition to Guizhou Daily discussion of “happy newspaper” published a relatively concentrated article