论文部分内容阅读
水管破裂致损案件具有自身特殊性和现实重要性,但并未在立法上得到应有的关注,尚无有关该类案件的专门规定。法院裁判该类案件时,援引条文各异,涉及《侵权责任法》、《合同法》、《物权法》中的不同条文。在认定是否成立侵权责任的问题上,在归责原则的选择、过错的认定上均表现出明显的有责化倾向。裁判者竭力将原告遭受的损失转移出去,以免原告无端受损,但此举却很可能导致被告无辜受过,并不足取。
Water pipe rupture damage cases have their own particularity and practical importance, but did not get due attention in the legislation, there is no specific provisions on such cases. Courts in such cases, the citation vary, involving “tort law”, “contract law”, “Property Law” in different provisions. In determining whether to establish liability for tort, the principle of choice of imputation, the identification of fault showed obvious tendency to be blamed. The referees tried their best to remove the losses suffered by the plaintiffs so as to prevent the plaintiffs from damaging the parties unjustly. However, the move would most likely result in the defendants being innocent and not enough.