论文部分内容阅读
斯特拉斯堡2000年3月2日根据宪法第44条第2款,这个裁决绝不是最终的裁决。在选择的法庭裁决和决定以官方报道的最终形式复制之前,它需要编辑修改。程序案件的来源是1996年12月13日,爱尔兰公民,威廉姆康泽恩先生(第一申请人)和英国公民,凯瑞康泽恩女士(第二申请人)根据宪法前25条关于保护人权和基本自由的规定提出申请,控告属于欧洲人权委员会的英联邦。申请人由在伦敦执业的律师约翰瓦德海姆先生作为代理人。英联邦政府由他们的代理人,伦敦外国和共同财富办公室的克里斯托弗霍姆斯勒先生代理。
Strasbourg 2 March 2000 According to article 44, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, this ruling is by no means the final verdict. It needs editorial changes until the selected court decision and decision are reproduced in the final form of official coverage. The source of the procedural cases is that on December 13, 1996, Irish citizens, Mr. William Comzer (first applicant) and British citizens, Ms. Carey Connezer (second applicant), filed under article 25 of the previous Constitution concerning the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms To file a complaint against the Commonwealth of the European Commission of Human Rights. The applicant is represented by Mr. John Wademheim, a lawyer practicing in London. The Commonwealth administration is represented by their agent, Mr. Christopher Holmesler, London Foreign and Commonwealth Office.