论文部分内容阅读
背景:公共娱乐场所往往是重大火灾隐患可能发生的场所,深圳“舞王”大火案便是极为深刻的教训。读者马铁男在租赁某大酒店后,遇到了酒店存在火灾隐患的情形,因出租方称无法整改,为避免造成火灾事故,他决定停业,出租方因此起诉解除合同。在法院审理过程中,该酒店被先予执行给原告,此后历时6年,判决仍无下文。咨询人:我叫马铁男,是辽宁省营口市人,我所租赁的酒店涉及火灾隐患的事情想向媒体反映。
Background: Public entertainment venues are often the places where major fire hazards may occur. The “big fire” incident in Shenzhen is a profound lesson. Readers Ma Tienan leased a hotel, the hotel encountered a fire hazard situation, because the lessor said it can not rectification, in order to avoid a fire accident, he decided to close down, the lessor sued the lifting of the contract. In the court proceedings, the hotel was first executed to the plaintiff, which lasted six years, the verdict is still below. Consultant: My name is Ma Tienan, is Yingkou City, Liaoning Province, I am renting hotels involved in the matter of fire hazards want to reflect to the media.