论文部分内容阅读
目的讨论支气管哮喘采用多索茶碱和氨茶碱治疗的效果差异。方法选取2015年4月至2016年1月,94例支气管哮喘的患者为研究对象,随机分观察组和对照组,对照组实施氨茶碱治疗,观察组实施多索茶碱治疗。结果观察组患者的有效率为95.74%,对照组患者有效率为80.85%,并且治疗后观察组的肺功能情况和最大呼吸气流情况明显优于对照组。结论茶碱类药物治疗哮喘及慢性阻塞性肺疾病疗效显著,多索茶碱比氨茶碱疗效更佳,且安全性更高,值得临床应用。
Objective To discuss the difference between the effects of doxofylline and aminophylline on bronchial asthma. Methods From April 2015 to January 2016, 94 patients with bronchial asthma were selected as research object and randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group received aminophylline treatment and the observation group received doxofylline treatment. Results The effective rate of the observation group was 95.74%, the effective rate of the control group was 80.85%, and the lung function and the maximum respiratory airflow in the observation group were significantly better than the control group after treatment. Conclusion Theophylline treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease significant effect, Doxofylline more effective than aminophylline, and more safe, worthy of clinical application.