论文部分内容阅读
目的了解牙科综合治疗椅接触面的污染程度,评价含氯消毒剂和保护膜屏障的避污效果与医患满意度。方法选取10台牙科综合治疗椅,随机分为擦拭消毒组和屏障保护组,每组5台,在诊疗前后对综合治疗椅接触面进行消毒或屏障保护,并选择相同采样点和采样方法进行采样及细菌培养。诊疗结束后调查患者和医护人员的满意度。结果消毒、屏障保护前牙科综合治疗椅接触面合格率仅为6.00%;采用擦拭消毒和屏障保护后综合治疗椅合格率均有提高(P<0.01),两种方法的合格率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。屏障保护组患者及医护人员的满意度均高于擦拭消毒组(P<0.01)。结论牙科综合治疗椅的接触面污染严重,采用擦拭消毒或屏障保护均能达到较好的避污效果,但屏障保护较擦拭消毒更方便快捷,患者和医护人员满意度较高。
Objective To understand the contamination level of the contact surfaces of dental chairs and to evaluate the anti-pollution effect and patient satisfaction of chlorine-containing disinfectants and protective film barriers. Methods Ten dental chairs were randomly divided into wipe disinfection group and barrier protection group, with five in each group. Sterilization or barrier protection was performed on the contact surfaces of the treatment chair before and after the treatment, and the same sampling points and sampling methods were selected for sampling And bacterial culture. Surveillance of patients and health care workers after the end of satisfaction. Results The pass rate of the contact surface of disinfection and barrier protection front dental chair was only 6.00%. The pass rate of the integrated treatment chair increased after wiping disinfection and barrier protection (P <0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two methods Significance (P> 0.05). Satisfaction of barrier protection group and medical staff were higher than wipe disinfection group (P <0.01). Conclusion The contact surface of dental chair is seriously polluted. The wiping disinfection or barrier protection can both achieve a better anti-pollution effect, but the barrier protection is more convenient and faster than wiping disinfection, and patients and health care workers are more satisfied.