论文部分内容阅读
对今年的电影金鸡奖评选结果,不仅在观众中,而且在文艺界内,不少人颇有疑义,这并不奇怪。因为获最佳故事片奖的《红衣少女》一个单项奖也没评上,而得了五个单项奖(最佳编剧、最佳男主角、最佳男配角、最佳女配角、最佳剪辑)的《高山下的花环》却戴不上“最佳故事片”的桂冠,这本身就是一个奇怪的现象。由此,有的同志呼吁金鸡奖的评委们应当重视影片的社会效果及观众信息等等。笔者认为,首先必须改变金鸡奖和百花奖的评选顺序,让“百花”先开,“金鸡”后鸣。众所周知,金鸡奖是专业性评奖,很大程度上代表了电影界权威人士的看法。而百花奖则纯粹是群众性评奖,实际上是在电影观众中最广泛的“民意测验。”它最能说明一部影片的社会效果和反映出观众信息。但目前两个奖的评选时间顺序,我
This year’s Golden Rooster Award for the movie results, not only in the audience, but also in the literary and art circles, many people quite doubt, it is not surprising. Because won the best feature film “Red Girl” a single award did not comment on, and won five individual awards (Best Screenplay, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor, Best Supporting Actress, Best Editor) The “garland under the mountain” is not the “best feature film” crown, which in itself is a strange phenomenon. As a result, some comrades urged Golden Jury Award judges should pay attention to the social effects of the film and audience information and so on. The author believes that we must first change the Golden Rooster Award and Huaihua Awards selection order, so that “flowers” first open, “Golden Rooster” after the Ming. As we all know, the Golden Rooster Award is a professional award, largely representing the views of film authorities. The Hundred Prize, on the other hand, is purely a mass award, and is actually the most widely used “opinion poll” among film viewers, which best describes the social effects of a film and reflects the audience. However, the current two awards in the order of time, me