论文部分内容阅读
证据与待证的主要事实之间的联系有直接也有间接,这构成了区分直接证据与间接证据的客观基础。主要事实是与法律要件相当的具体的生活事实,判断、检验是否存在直接证据的标准和依据在于是否存在可以直接证明主要事实的证据。在民事诉讼实务中,一些证据可以用来直接证明主要事实,甚至一个直接证据可以单独证明主要事实的存在与否,因而直接证据是真实存在的。区分直接与间接证据时,采用单一的分类标准,即只是把能否直接证明主要事实作为区分这两种证据的标准,比采用直接、单独双重分类标准更为可取。
There is direct and indirect connection between the evidence and the main fact to be witnessed, which constitutes the objective basis for distinguishing between direct evidence and indirect evidence. The main fact is the concrete life fact commensurate with the legal requirement. The criterion and basis for judging whether there is direct evidence or not are the existence of evidence that can directly prove the main facts. In the civil litigation practice, some evidence can be used to directly prove the main fact. Even a direct evidence can prove the existence of the main fact alone, so the direct evidence is true. When distinguishing between direct and indirect evidence, the use of a single taxonomy, that is, the mere fact that direct evidence of the main fact can be used as a criterion for distinguishing the two types of evidence, is preferable to the use of direct and separate double taxonomies.