论文部分内容阅读
自苏联解体以来,国内学者围绕戈尔巴乔夫问题进行了诸多研究,对戈尔巴乔夫改革的分析与论述也逐渐趋于系统化和理性化。总体来说,研究视野较为开阔,角度多维,相关观点论述较为成熟。相关热点问题研究深入、细化,边缘问题凸显,领域拓宽,相关争议问题延伸,各家说法不一,莫衷一是。与此同时,国内史料研究也显现出一定的不足和缺陷,在许多重大问题上还存在着根本性的分歧,热点问题的重复研究多,探索研究新领域的较少,缺乏深层次的理论挖掘,前景展望的研究少,研究中“避重就轻”的现象大量存在。这些都需要我们在今后的研究中进一步关注和解决。
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, many domestic scholars have conducted many studies on the Gorbachev issue, and the analysis and exposition of Gorbachev’s reform has gradually become systematic and rational. Overall, the research field is more open, multi-dimensional perspective, the related argument is more mature. Research on relevant hot issues has been deepening, detailed, highlighting the fringe problems, broadening the scope of the relevant issues and extending the issues of controversy. Different opinions and opinions have different opinions. At the same time, the research on domestic historical materials also shows some deficiencies and shortcomings. On many major issues, there are still fundamental differences. There are many hot issues, many researching new fields, and lack of deep theoretical excavation , There are few researches on the prospect of the future and there is a lot of phenomena in the study “avoiding the light”. All these require us to pay more attention and solve in the future research.