论文部分内容阅读
“周原甲骨”是20世纪后半叶最重要的考古发现之一。它包括:(1)1977年陕西岐山县凤雏村西周建筑遗址西厢房11号和31号灰坑中出土的1700余片甲骨(本文以H11编号的283片和以H31编号的10片只是其中有字或原先怀疑有字的甲骨);(2)1979年陕西扶风齐家村1、3、4号灰坑中出土的12片甲骨和在附近采集的22片甲骨(本文以FQ编号的7片只是其中有字或原先怀疑有字的甲骨)。这一发现在学术界曾引起热烈讨论,但长期以来,大家依据的主要是徐锡台先生(已故)和陈全方先生的早期摹本。这两套摹本,各有贡献,也各有不足,有些地方还存在矛盾,常令读者无所适从。值得欣慰的是,最近出版的曹玮先生编著的《周原甲骨文》,终于将这批材料中
One of the most important archeological discoveries of the second half of the twentieth century was Zhoujian Oracle. It includes: (1) In 1977, more than 1,700 pieces of oracle bone unearthed in No. 11 and No. 31 pits in West Wing, the site of the Western Zhou Dynasty in Fengxu Village, Qishan County, Shaanxi Province (in this paper, 283 pieces of H11 code and 10 pieces of H31 code are only (2) 12 pieces of oracle bone unearthed in No. 1, No. 3 and No. 4 gray cranes of Qijia Village, Fufeng, Shaanxi Province in 1979 and 22 pieces of oracle bone collected in the vicinity (in this paper, seven pieces with FQ number Only the words or the original suspected oracle bone). This discovery has aroused heated discussions in academia. However, for a long time, it was mainly based on the early copies of Mr. Xu Xitai (deceased) and Mr. Chen Quanfang. These two sets of copies, each with its own contribution, also have their own shortcomings. In some places, there are still contradictions that often make readers know what to do. The good news is that recently published by Mr. Cao Wei, “Zhou original Oracle”, and finally these materials