论文部分内容阅读
据媒体披露,国家农业部组织广东、深圳等地科研人员从果子狸、蛇、猴子、蝙蝠等野生动物体内分离出 SARS 病毒,推测人类 SARS 病可能来源于果子狸等野生动物。尽管目前有限的实验依据尚未以科学论文形式正式发表,也还不能完全表明 SARS 病毒从野生动物传至人类的全过程,但至少在探索 SARS 病毒来源之谜的道路上又前进了一步。随后,中国农业大学科研组宣称,经调查果子狸并不带毒,果子狸们自然无法向科学家们表白,于是似乎一时是非难辨……其实,前后两者方法、结果都可信,两者结果均为对所测样本的真实反映,但两者结果并不能相互否
According to media reports, the Ministry of Agriculture organized scientific research personnel in Guangdong and Shenzhen to separate the SARS virus from the wild animals such as civets, snakes, monkeys and bats, suggesting that human SARS may originate from wildlife such as civets. Although the limited experimental evidence has not yet been formally published in scientific papers and the SARS virus can not be fully conveyed from wildlife to humans, it has at least taken another step toward exploring the mystery of the SARS virus source. Subsequently, the research group of China Agricultural University claimed that after investigation, the civet cats are not poisonous and the civet cats naturally can not tell the scientists. So it seems that they are indiscriminate at one time ... In fact, the methods of both before and after have credible results. Both of them The results are the true reflection of the measured samples, but the results of both can not be mutually exclusive