论文部分内容阅读
结构主义叙事学家提出“故事”与“话语”的区分,主张故事独立于话语,即“故事不是话 语”。解构主义叙事学家反对“故事”与“话语”的区分,主张话语力量创造故事,即“话语是故 事”。本文通过辨析双方对“故事”与“话语”这两个概念的实际使用,指出结构主义叙事学家与 解构主义叙事学家分别在存在物层面与存在层面上使用这两个概念这个事实,据此提出“故事 是(或不是)话语”的关系结构,有助于文本阐释者在实践中取长补短,从而有助于推动叙述学 在我国的发展。
Structuralist narratologists propose the distinction between “story” and “discourse”, claiming that story is independent of discourse, that is, “story is not discourse.” Deconstructionist narratists oppose the distinction between “story” and “discourse”, claiming that discourse power creates a story, that is, “discourse is a story.” By analyzing the actual use of the two concepts of “story ” and “discourse ”, this paper points out that the structuralist narratologists and the deconstructionist narratologists use these two concepts on the existential level and the existential level respectively According to this fact, we propose that the relationship structure of “story is (or not) discourse” helps the interpreter of text help each other in practice, which helps to promote the development of narratology in our country.