论文部分内容阅读
受户籍制度影响,上海市流动人口家庭面临孩子的初中后教育选择问题。回去,意味着重新适应环境,重新调整学习进度;留下,意味着只能进入职校技校中专,无法在上海考大学。两种选择都需要这些家庭付出沉重的代价。本文沿着家庭策略理论的经典路径,寻找“危机—应对”的模式。同时,引入“隐性抗争”和“隐性合谋”两个概念,探索孩子在互动中的主体性,试图从理论视角将家庭策略具体化为孩子策略、父母策略以及策略之间的动态对抗性。为了弥补以往研究过于强调父母策略的不足,“隐性抗争”和“隐性合谋”注重孩子的主体视角,强调孩子的主体性。
Influenced by the census register system, the floating population in Shanghai faces the problem of children’s junior middle school education choice. Go back, means to re-adapt to the environment, readjustment of learning progress; left, means that only vocational schools can enter the vocational school, can not be in Shanghai University. Both options require these families to pay a heavy price. This article follows the classical path of family strategy theory and looks for the pattern of crisis-coping. At the same time, two concepts of “hidden resistance” and “hidden collusion” are introduced to explore the subjectivity of children in the interaction and to try to conceptualize the family strategy as a child strategy, a parent strategy and a strategy from a theoretical perspective Dynamic confrontation. In order to make up for the lack of emphasis on parental strategies in the past, the “hidden protest” and “covert conspiracy” focus on the child’s subjective perspective and emphasize the child’s subjectivity.