论文部分内容阅读
一、問题的背景和提出實驗科學的最大特點在於其可预测性差導致的對於實驗的依頼。實驗證據的功能则是将實驗的過程和結果以證據的形式加以固化,化學、醫藥、生物、材料等實驗科學领域專利性的評判離不開實驗證據。如美國巡逥上訴法院所述,“儘管内容不同,但所有案件的標準均要求将理論轉化爲實践、将基礎科學轉化爲其應用,将研究計劃轉化爲經證實的實用品”~1。爲了證明發明在提出專利申請之時已經處於完成的狀態,而非停留於理論或研究計劃的
First, the background of the problem and put forward the most important feature of experimental science lies in its poor predictability caused by the experimental dependence. The function of experimental evidence is to solidify the experimental process and result in the form of evidence, and the evaluation of patentability in the field of experimental science such as chemistry, medicine, biology and materials can not be separated from the experimental evidence. As the U.S. Court of Appeals for Courts stated, “Despite the differences in content, the standards in all cases require that the theory be translated into practice, the basic science into its application and the research plan into proven utility” . In order to prove that the invention was in a state of completion at the time of the filing of the patent application and not in theory or research plan