论文部分内容阅读
在国家紧急权力发动的具体情形、由谁决定紧急状态的存在以及对紧急权力的监督等关于紧急权力宪法条款设计的要件规范、主体规范和保障规范三个核心问题上,德国从1919年的《威玛宪法》到1968年的《基本法》,经历了从概括条款之立法到列举条款之立法,从独任制之立法到合议制之立法,从监督能力欠缺之立法到监督能力维持之立法的转变。我国宪法修正案中的紧急权力条款则存在要件规范和监督规范之缺损和主体规范之空泛等缺陷。借鉴德国的立法经验,从要件规范、主体规范和保障规范等方面完善我国紧急权力宪法条款之设计。
On the three core issues of the norm, the norm of norm and the norm of guarantee about the design of constitutional provisions of emergency power, the specific circumstances of the state emergency power launch, the decision of the existence of the state of emergency by the who and the supervision of the emergency power, The Weimar Constitution upheld the Basic Law of 1968 through legislation ranging from general provisions to enactment of articles. From the legislation of the independent system to the collegial system legislation, from the legislation that lacks monitoring capacity to the legislation that upholds the ability to maintain change. The emergency power clauses in our country’s constitutional amendment have defects such as the lack of standardization and supervision norms and the vagueness of the main norms. Learn from the legislative experience in Germany and improve the design of the constitutional provisions of our emergency powers from the aspects of the specification of norms, the rules of the main body and the norms of protection.