论文部分内容阅读
夜郎先生的《“邮局代封封”质疑》就一件拍品的真伪提出疑问。本文只就疑问提供一些史料辨析,对那件拍品不予置评。首先,《质疑》提出:“1907年徽州是否开办了邮政局,因手中资料限制,无法得知”。由邮政总办贺壁理主持编撰的《光绪三十三年邮政事务总论》中第六节《整顿办法情形》中说:“是年(指1907年)出印之书,则有《通邮汇编》一项,特为邮局办公人员及局外之人检阅已设之局所。编内将已开之总分各局,按省按府分别详载,并标志号,表明某处系属何等邮局。其后陆续开设者,仍拟随时添补。”附图就是“成书于丁未之秋”的《大清通邮汇编》中有关安徽省的一部分局名。标明1907
Mr. Yelang’s “postal closure” questioned the authenticity of a lot of questions. This article only provides some historical data to analyze the question, and does not comment on the piece. First of all, “questioning” put forward: “In 1907 Huizhou opened a post office, due to the data restrictions, can not be informed.” It is stated in Section VI, “Rectification Measures,” in the “General Review of Postal Affairs in the Thirty-three Years of Guangxu” that the postal general office Hebi Li presided over the compilation: “In the year (referring to 1907) A review of offices already set up by post office staff and outsiders is in place to compile a list of the offices that have been opened. After the continued opening of those who are still intending to fill at any time. ”The photo is“ book ”in the compilation of“ Qing dynasty postal compilation, ”part of the name of Anhui Province. Marked 1907