论文部分内容阅读
中国人民大学教授顾海兵认为,现行小康标准存在偏误。一是城乡分割的小康标准违反了小康的国民性质。小康这一概念历来是指全体国民,其标准也应是全国统一。现行的小康标准把它人为地划分为国家、城市、农村三套不同标准,并且城市小康量值比农村小康量值高出1倍以上,这样的小康标准是自相矛盾、不可相容的。二是没有把农民小康
Gu Haibing, a professor at Renmin University of China, believes that existing well-to-do standards are biased. First, the well-to-do standard of urban-rural separation violates the well-to-do national character. The concept of a well-to-do society has always referred to all the people and its standards should also be unified across the country. The current well-to-do standard divides people into three different standards of the country, the city and the countryside artificially, and urban well-to-do values are more than double those of the well-to-do values in rural areas. Such well-to-do standards are self-contradictory and incompatible. Second, farmers are not well-off