论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析评价两种常用烧伤治疗方案的成本-效果,在提升患者生存质量水平的前提下,找到一种成本较低且治疗效果较好的治疗方案,以减少医疗资源的浪费情况。方法:抽取我院2011年6月至2016年6月收治的60例患者为研究对象,并分析收集研究对象入院时的病情以及治疗期间的医疗费用、治疗效果等资料,并按要求将其分为观察组与对照组,观察组患者给予磺胺嘧啶银软膏油纱覆盖包扎的治疗疗法,对照组则给予切削痴植皮组的治疗方法,而后在进行成本-效果分析。结果:观察组成本明显低于对照组,且观察组的治疗有效率明显高于对照组。结论:磺胺嘧啶银软膏油纱覆盖包扎疗法在治疗深Ⅱ°烧伤方面具有显著疗效,且成本费用较低。同时,成本-效果分析在评估治疗方案方面具有一定的客观性与直观性,值得被推广使用。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two commonly used burns treatment programs and to find a lower-cost and better-curative treatment plan to improve the quality of life of patients to reduce the waste of medical resources. Methods: Totally 60 patients admitted from June 2011 to June 2016 in our hospital were selected as the study subjects, and the condition of the patients at admission, the medical expenses and the treatment effect during the treatment period were analyzed, and the data were collected as required For the observation group and the control group, the observation group were given silver sulfadiazine ointment gauze dressing treatment, the control group was given the treatment of cutting off the skin graft group, and then in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Results: The cost of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the treatment efficiency of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfadiazine silver ointment oiled gauze overwrap has significant efficacy in the treatment of deep Ⅱ ° burns with lower cost. At the same time, the cost-effectiveness analysis has some objectivity and intuition in evaluating the treatment plan, which deserves to be popularized.