论文部分内容阅读
在党的社会主义总路綫的光辉照耀下,在1958年和1959年的大跃进浪潮中,果树生产和研究工作出现了新的面貌,各地创造了许多高额丰产典范,同时批判了过去一些旧的论点,肯定了许多新的论点。如果园深翻熟化土壤,葡萄多次结果,幼树早期丰产,保花保果等方面的问题;这一切都是大跃进的产物,因为它本身是科学的具有着强大的生命力,所以对推动果树生产和科学研究将起到重大的作用。然而,在我们的科学队伍中却有一些人,对这些新的论点的提出,特别是对保花保果问题抱怀疑态度或熟视无睹,也有的评头评足,或曲解反对;总之是企图压制新生事物的成长。例如有的认为“保花保果只是理论,而实际是不疏不行”,“疏花疏果是其他技术不可代替的”,“保花保果是对的,伹疏花疏果正是为了保花保果”,“疏花疏果是消灭大小年的技术措施”等等诸如上述种种看
Under the brilliant shining of the party’s socialist general line, in the wave of the Great Leap Forward of 1958 and 1959, new achievements were made in the production and research of fruit trees, and many high-yielding models were created in various places. At the same time, some old Of the argument, affirmed many new arguments. If the garden deep matured soil, grapes multiple results, saplings early high yield, flower protection and other issues; all this is the product of the Great Leap Forward, because it itself is a science with strong vitality, so to promote Fruit tree production and scientific research will play a significant role. However, there are some people in our scientific ranks who doubt or turn a blind eye to the proposition of these new arguments, especially the question of the guarantee of flower and fruit preservation. Some may even comment on or criticize the opposition; in other words, they attempt to suppress The growth of new things. For example, some people think that “the guarantee of fruit and flower is only a theory, but the actual one is not sparse,” and “thinning and thinning of flowers is irreplaceable by other technologies.” “The flower and fruit preservation is right, Paul Paul fruit ”,“ thinning thinning is the elimination of the size of the technical measures ”and so on such as the above