论文部分内容阅读
“追溯晚明”是自近代以来文学史上的一个突出现象,及至今日仍在产生重要影响。但通过对近百年追溯活动的考察,我们不难发现,一方面,虽说追溯活动持续进行中,但我们逐渐忽略了对晚明自身的深入研究,仅是在不断重复某些长期因循的概念化、教条化的说辞,在史料、史实上时有偏差,且我们的理论基础也面临质疑。另一方面,自上世纪八十年代以来,追溯活动被纳入古今融合的视域中,但由于我们秉承进步史观,既影响了我们对历史的评价,也不利于对未来的展望,同时,我们过度凸显了思想层面,对文学层面的关注严重不足。
“Trace to the late Ming and early Ming” is a prominent phenomenon in the history of literature since modern times and it still has an important impact to this day. However, it is not hard to find that, on the one hand, while the retroactive activities are continuing, we have gradually neglected the thorough study of the late Ming itself and merely repeated some of the long-term conceptualizations, Dogmatic rhetoric, in the historical data, historical facts deviate from time to time, and our theoretical foundation is also questioned. On the other hand, since the 1980s, retrospective activities have been incorporated into the context of ancient and modern integration. However, as we uphold the concept of progress in history, it not only affects our evaluation of history but also does not help us to look forward to the future. At the same time, We have over-emphasized the ideological level, and the literary level is seriously under-represented.