论文部分内容阅读
语词之争是指争论双方由于对语词意义的不同理解而产生的争论。语词之争是发生在语言层面的分歧,它与实质性争论相对。“排除法”是鉴别和处理一个争论是否语词之争的有益尝试。排除法把哲学争论分解为涉及基底概念的争论和关于哪些概念是基底概念的争论。基底概念是指无法用更基本的术语澄清它所涉及争论的概念。“半透明性”概念所表达的思想是,如果两个说话者实质性地一致赞同句子集T中的所有句子,那么关于句子S的任何争论都必定是语词的。基于对基底概念和半透明性概念的阐释,本文最终得出一个卡尔纳普式的结论:“全部真理都被基底真理半透明地确定。”
Controversy between words is argued that both sides of the meaning of the word due to different understanding of the controversy. The wording of the wording is the disagreement that takes place on the linguistic level, as opposed to the substantive argument. “Exclusion Act ” is a useful attempt to identify and deal with whether a debate is a verbiage. The exclusion method breaks down philosophical arguments into debates involving the concept of the base and arguments about which concepts are the base concepts. Substrate concept means that the concept of the argument in question can not be clarified in more basic terms. The idea expressed by the notion of translucency is that if two speakers are substantially in agreement with all the sentences in the sentence set T, then any argument about the sentence S must be a verb. Based on the interpretation of the concepts of basement and translucency, the article concludes with a Carnar-Ely’s conclusion: “All truths are determined translucency by the base truth.”