论文部分内容阅读
“新疆农业科学”1961年1—2期合刊上刊登了新疆农科所土壤肥料室报导的“养猪积肥保肥试验简结”一文,读后有如下几点意见,提出来和同志们商榷。 1.文章报导的数据的代表性及分析方法值得商讨。例如文章中既然指出粪尿混存氮素损失43％,何以用干粪吸尿、干粪垫圈氮素损失只分别为14％奥16.5％,而以土吸尿损失达34.1％?不论以干粪吸尿也好,或以干粪垫圈
“Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences” in January 1-2, 1961, a joint issue of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Institute of soil and fertilizer room reported “pig fat fertilizer summary” article, after reading the following comments, put forward and comrades Discuss. 1. The article reports on the representativeness of the data and analytical methods worth discussing. For example, since the paper pointed out that 43% of the nitrogen loss of excrement mixed with urine, why use dry urine, dry excrement was only 14% of the nitrogen loss of 16.5%, while soil up to 34.1% of urine loss? Whether dry Excretion of urine is also good, or with dry dung