论文部分内容阅读
目的:对经腹以及经阴道超声应用于子宫肌瘤诊断中的临床价值进行比较。方法:选取于2014年2月-2015年9月期间在我院接受治疗的子宫肌瘤患者76例,对以上患者分别进行经腹以及经阴道超声检查,观察两种检查方法的诊断正确率并进行比较。结果:经阴道超声检查中诊断正确率为90.8%,显著高于经腹部超声检查的71.1%;同时经阴道超声检查中误诊率为5.3%,漏诊率为3.9%,均显著低于经腹部超声检查的15.8%和13.2%,组间差异经t检验,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经阴道超声应用于子宫肌瘤诊断中的临床价值要显著优于经腹超声,具有很高的诊断正确率,是一种有效的诊断妇科疾病的方法,值得大力推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical value of transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of uterine fibroids. Methods: Totally 76 cases of uterine fibroids were treated in our hospital from February 2014 to September 2015. The transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography were performed on the above patients respectively, and the diagnostic correct rates of the two methods were observed. Compare. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography was 90.8%, which was significantly higher than that of transvaginal ultrasonography (71.1%). Meanwhile, the misdiagnosis rate of transvaginal sonography was 5.3% and the rate of misdiagnosis was 3.9%, which were significantly lower than those of transabdominal ultrasonography 15.8% and 13.2% of the examination, the difference between groups by t test, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical value of transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine fibroids should be significantly better than the transabdominal ultrasound, with a high diagnostic accuracy, is an effective method of diagnosis of gynecological diseases, it is worth to promote.