论文部分内容阅读
作为孕育、创造博大精深的齐文化之齐国,不仅给我们留下了丰富的思想财富,同时也留下了大量遗迹宝藏。但由于年代久远,其有关记载几经口授、传抄、抢救,更有对古载附会解释者,因而,使有些遗迹的地理位置,出现了异说。如汉未有人以营陵附会营丘,致造成千古不休之争辩,就是一例。笔者曾于60年代参与齐国故城及其周边地区的实勘,今据勘探实得,结合民间有关遗存、传说,再参照古文献中之有关记载,对古齐存异说之部分遗迹,清辨正误,明证其地
As a breeding country, creating a profound national culture Qi, not only left us a wealth of ideological wealth, but also left a large number of relics treasure. However, as time goes by, the relevant records have been interpreted, copied, and salvaged by the ancient people. As a result, there are differences in the geographical location of some relics. Such as the Han did not Yingying camp attached hill, resulting in endless debate over the endless, is an example. In the 1960s, the author took part in the actual survey of the ancient city of Qi and its surrounding areas. According to the actual exploration and folk relics and legends, referring to the related records in the ancient literature, Clear right and wrong, proof of its place