论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较腹部超声和阴道超声在诊断异位妊娠中的效果,为临床诊断提供参考。方法:回顾性分析在我院2011年3月~2012年3月期间收治的95名异位妊娠患者,使用腹部超声和阴道超声这2种检查方法对患者进行检查,对比她们的阳性检出率。结果:95名异位妊娠的患者中,使用腹部超声检出72名,检出率为75.7%,使用阴道超声检出90人,检出率为94.7%,二者联合使用,检出94人,检出率为99%。结论:经过临床研究,阴道超声比腹腔超声在诊断异位妊娠方面更加准确,有更高的检出率,二者联合可以有效地提高阳性确诊率。
Objective: To compare the effect of abdominal ultrasonography and vaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, providing reference for clinical diagnosis. Methods: A total of 95 patients with ectopic pregnancy who were treated in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were examined by two methods: abdominal ultrasound and vaginal ultrasound, and their positive detection rate was compared . Results: Seventy-five patients with ectopic pregnancy were examined by abdominal ultrasonography, with a detection rate of 75.7%. Ninety patients were detected by vaginal ultrasound with a detection rate of 94.7%. Totally 94 , The detection rate was 99%. Conclusion: After clinical study, vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than the abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, with a higher detection rate, the combination of the two can effectively improve the positive diagnosis rate.