论文部分内容阅读
现在流行这么一句话,中国在国际上买什么,什么就贵,卖什么,什么就便宜。乍听上去,逻辑似乎颇为不通:现在不是被人用枪炮逼着强买强卖的时代,贵了可以不买,便宜了可以不卖。作为既买又卖的大客户,在号称自由贸易的全球化时代,为何竟对价格毫无发言权?然而,我们却不得不面对尴尬的现实。都以资源行业为例,我们买走了国际市场上一半的铁矿石,却只能接受别人一路高歌猛进的涨价;我们卖掉了全球市场90%以上的稀土,却被人压低价格。如果说国际寡头算准你不得不买,“宰你没商量”还说得过去的话,那稀土这类也是别人“不得不买”的资源,也要贱价出售,就实在说不过去了。一买一卖,截然相反的过程,却导致了相同的苦果:利润送给了国际寡头,破坏和污染留给了国人。毋庸置疑,一只背后的手算准了我们的短板,充分利用规则攫取了巨额的利益,损害了中
Now popular in such a sentence, what China is buying internationally, what is expensive, what to sell and what is cheaper. At first glance, the logic seems quite unreasonable: it is not the time to be forced to buy and sell by guns, you can not buy expensive, you can not sell cheap. As a big client, both buying and selling, in the era of globalization known as free trade, why do we have no say in price? However, we have to face the awkward reality. Take the resource industry as an example. We bought more than half of the iron ore in the international market, but we can only accept price increases that are triumphant by others. We have sold more than 90% of the rare earths in the global market and have been pushed down. If you say that you have to buy an international oligopoly, you can not justify the fact that rare earth is also a resource for others, you have to buy, and you have to sell at a low price. The one-and-a-deal, diametrically opposite process led to the same bitter result: the profits were given to the international oligarchs, and the destruction and pollution left to the people. Needless to say, one behind the hand of the calculation of our short board, make full use of the rules to grab a huge amount of benefits, undermining the