论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨心理干预对哮喘患者生活质量的影响,以期为哮喘患者提供有效的心理干预方法,提高其生活质量。方法将符合条件的哮喘患者随机分为干预组(110例)和非干预组(106例),在入院第2天使用哮喘患者一般情况调查表、哮喘生活质量评估表(AQLQ)对患者进行测查。非干预组行常规治疗,干预组在常规治疗的基础上进行心理干预。两组患者在出院前1天,应用AQLQ进行测查。3个月后对两组进行随访及AQLQ测查。结果干预后及干预3个月后,干预组AQLQ各因子得分及总分显著高于非干预组(P<0.01);干预后与干预前、干预3个月后与干预前两组AQLQ各因子得分及总分差值比较,干预组提高的分值均高于非干预组(P<0.01);干预3个月后与干预后两组AQLQ的活动受限、对自身健康的关心及总分差值的比较均有统计学意义(P<0.01),干预组提高的分值显著高于非干预组。结论心理干预能改善哮喘患者的生活质量。
Objective To explore the impact of psychological intervention on the quality of life of patients with asthma, in order to provide effective psychological intervention for asthma patients to improve their quality of life. Methods Eligible asthmatic patients were randomly divided into intervention group (n = 110) and non-intervention group (n = 106). The patients were assessed on the second day after admission by using asthma general condition questionnaire and asthma quality of life assessment table (AQLQ) check. Non-intervention group routine treatment, intervention group on the basis of routine treatment for psychological intervention. One day before discharge, two groups of patients were tested with AQLQ. Three months later, the two groups were followed up and AQLQ test. Results After intervention and intervention for 3 months, the AQLQ scores and scores of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the non-intervention group (P <0.01). After the intervention and before the intervention, 3 months after the intervention, the AQLQ factors Score and total score difference, the score of the intervention group was higher than that of the non-intervention group (P <0.01); the intervention of AQLQ after 3 months intervention and the two groups was limited, the care about their own health and the total score The differences were statistically significant (P <0.01), the intervention group increased significantly higher scores than the non-intervention group. Conclusion Psychological intervention can improve the quality of life of patients with asthma.