论文部分内容阅读
据“清华简”《耆夜》记载了周公赋《蟋蟀》诗的情形,与《唐风·蟋蟀》相比照,二者的内容和诗旨大致相符,而形式及用韵上则存在整齐与参差之别。简本《蟋蟀》体现出即兴创作的痕迹,而今本则应当是经过加工、整饬而成的。参照可靠的传世文献出土文献,本文对《毛诗序》“、三家诗”以及郑笺的说解进行分析,认为《蟋蟀》“刺晋僖公”的说法是有问题的。最后,分析了另一篇周公诗———《鸱鸮》,发现先秦文献及师说的亡佚,是造成汉儒说解出现分歧和谬误的原因。
According to “Tsinghua ” “Qi Ye ” recorded the poem “crickets” by Zhou Gongfu, compared with “Tang Cricket”, the content of the two roughly consistent with the poem, while the form and rhyme there Tidy and difference do not. The simplified version of “Cricket” embodies traces of improvisation, and now it should be processed and sharpened. With reference to the reliable documents unearthed from handed down documents, this article analyzes the explanations of “Mao Poetry Preface”, “Three Poems” and Zheng Jian, and holds the view that there is a problem with “crickets” and “ji jin xi”. Finally, it analyzes another poem “poem”, and finds that the pre-Qin literature and teacher’s death are the causes of the differences and fallacies caused by Confucianism.