论文部分内容阅读
2005年8月,环球、索尼、华纳、百代、新艺宝、香港正东、金牌等7家知名唱片公司以百度提供的MP3搜索下载服务侵犯其相关音乐作品的信息网络传播权为由,先后对百度公司提起诉讼。而法院则以“被告MP3搜索服务的涉案行为不构成复制或者通过网络传播涉案歌曲”为由,驳回了原告的所有诉讼请求。一年之后,11家国际知名唱片公司又联合起来,抱团起诉雅虎中国侵犯其相关音乐作品的著作邻接权。而这次,法院虽然沿用了百度一案中的判决标准,判定雅虎中
August 2005, Universal, Sony, Warner, EMI, Nintendo, Hong Kong Zhengdong, Gold and other well-known seven record companies to Baidu MP3 search download services infringed its related music works of information dissemination of copyright grounds, successively Baidu company sued. However, the court dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims on the ground that “the involved act of the defendant’s MP3 search service did not constitute a duplicate or spread the involved song through the Internet.” A year later, 11 international record labels joined forces to prosecute Yahoo China for infringing the copyright of its related musical works. This time, although the court followed the judgment in the case of Baidu standards, determine Yahoo