论文部分内容阅读
1、关于企业集团范围的界定问题。目前我国理论界比较一致的意见,是以资产纽带作为界定的标准,认为企业集团是在资产联合的基础上形成的群体。这一定义避免了以往的资产联合与生产联合、销售联合相混同而造成企业集团的边界模糊不清的矛盾。 2、关于“资本双重登记注册”问题。在日本,企业集团是母公司根据发展需要而不断进行产权投资遥步形成的母子公司,而我国现有的大多数企业集团是先有“儿子”,再找“母亲”,发展企业集团,是为“儿子”配“母亲”的问题。母公司为了壮大实力,以利于对外经营,要求把子公司的资本加在一起进行注册登记,
1, on the definition of the scope of enterprise groups. At present, the relatively unanimous opinion of China’s theory circle is based on the asset ties as the defining criterion. It is believed that enterprise groups are formed on the basis of asset combination. This definition avoids the contradiction that the previous combination of asset union and production, combined with sales, resulted in ambiguity of the boundaries of the enterprise group. 2. On the question of “double capital registration”. In Japan, an enterprise group is a parent company that is based on the development of the parent company’s continuous equity investment. However, most of the existing enterprise groups in China are first “son”, then “maternal” and the development enterprise group. The question of “son” with “mother”. In order for the parent company to strengthen its strength to facilitate foreign operations, it is required to add the subsidiary’s capital together for registration.