论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨锁定加压钢板(LCP)与解剖钢板(AP)内固定治疗闭合性胫骨Pilon骨折疗效及对下肢功能康复的影响.方法 将82例闭合性胫骨Pilon骨折病人随机分为LCP内固定治疗组(LCP组)和AP内固定治疗组(AP组),每组各41例.比较两组围手术期指标及术后并发症发生率,采用美国足踝外科协会踝-后足关节评分系统(AOFAS-AHS)评价踝关节功能,采用Lysholm评分评价下肢功能,测定血清白细胞介素(IL)-1β和IL-6水平.结果 LCP组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、首次下地时间、骨折愈合时间依次为(103.34 ± 11.34)ml、(47.65 ± 7.89)分钟、(9.01 ± 2.23)天、(5.31 ± 1.27)天、(16.23 ± 2.12)周,AP组依次为(132.25 ± 34.41)ml、(60.54 ± 11.23)分钟、(11.43 ± 2.57)天、(6.23 ± 1.56)天、(23.12 ± 3.31)周,LCP组低于AP组(P<0.05);LCP术后踝关节功能优良率为95.12%,显著高于AP组的82.93%(P<0.05);LCP组术后并发症发生率为4.88%,显著低于AP组的29.27%(P<0.05);术后3、6、12个月,LCP组的AOFAS-AHS评分依次为(69.52 ± 4.18)分、(78.89 ± 6.73)分、(87.23 ± 6.34)分,AP组依次为(65.09 ± 4.45)分、(70.13 ± 5.34)分、(76.69 ± 5.91)分,LCP组显著高于AP组(P<0.05);术后3、6、12个月,LCP组的Lysholm评分依次为(77.12 ± 6.43)分、(82.12 ± 7.81)分、(86.19 ± 8.11)分,AP组依次为(67.25 ± 5.56)分、(72.21 ± 7.23)分、(77.12 ± 7.54)分,LCP组显著高于AP组(P<0.05).术后3天、4周,LCP组的血清IL-1β、IL-6分别为(0.37 ± 0.09)pg/ml、(0.19 ± 0.06) pg/ml和(201.23 ± 30.12)ng/L、(102.23 ± 25.21)ng/L,AP组分别为(0.45 ± 0.13)pg/ml、(0.27 ± 0.09)pg/ml和(246.71 ± 41.23)ng/L、(158.95 ± 30.41)ng/L,LCP组显著低于AP组(P<0.05).结论 LCP与AP治疗闭合性胫骨Pilon骨折均具有显著疗效,但LCP能够减少手术创伤,缩短手术时间及术后恢复时间,一定程度上提高踝关节及下肢功能,并可减少内固定后骨折延迟愈合等并发症发生率.“,”Objective To investigate the effect of locking compression plate(LCP)and anatomi-cal plate(AP)in the treatment of closed tibial Pilon fracture and its influence on lower limb functional re-habilitation.Methods A total of 82 patients with closed tibial Pilon fractures were randomly divided into LCP internal fixation group(LCP group,n=41)and AP internal fixation group(AP group,n=41).The perioperative indexes and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.The ankle function was evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Scale(AOFAS-AHS),the lower limb function was evaluated by Lysholm scale,the serum levels of inter-leukin-1β(IL-1β)and interleukin-6(IL-6)were detected.Results The intraoperative blood loss,opera-tion time,hospitalization time,first ground time,fracture healing time were(103. 34 ± 11. 34)ml, (47.65 ± 7.89)min,(9.01 ± 2.23)d,(5.31 ± 1.27)d,(16.23 ± 2.12)weeks in LCP group respective-ly,the AP group were(132.25 ± 34.41)ml,(60.54 ± 11.23)ml,(11.43 ± 2.57)d,(6.23 ± 1.56)d, (23.12 ± 3.31)weeks,respectively.The LCP group were significantly lower than AP group(P<0.05);The excellent rate of ankle function of LCP group was 95.12%,significantly higher than 82.93% in the AP group(P<0.05);The incidence of postoperative complications was 4.88% in the LCP group,which was significantly lower than 29.27% in the AP group(P<0.05);At 3,6 and 12 months after operation, the AOFAS-AHS scores in the LCP group were(69.52 ± 4.18)points,(78.89 ± 6.73)points and (87.23 ± 6.34)points respectively,the AP group were(65.09 ± 4.45)points,(70.13 ± 5.34)points and (76.69 ± 5.91)points respectively,the LCP group were significantly higher than AP group(P<0.05);At 3,6 and 12 months after operation,the Lysholm scores were(77.12 ± 6.43)points,(82.12 ± 7.81)points and(86.19 ± 8.11)points in LCP group,AP group were(67.25 ± 5.56)points,(72.21 ± 7.23)and (77.12 ± 7.54)points,the LCP group was significantly higher than AP group(P<0.05).At 3 d and 4 weeks after operation,the serum levels of IL-1β in LCP group were(0.37 ± 0.09)pg/ml,(0.19 ± 0.06) pg/ml,while in AP group were(0.45 ± 0.13)pg/ml,(0.27 ± 0.09)pg/ml;the serum levels of IL-6 in LCP group were(201.23 ± 30.12)ng/L,(102.23 ± 25.21)ng/L,while in AP group were(246.71 ± 41.23)ng/L,(158.95 ± 25.21)ng/L.The AP group were significantly lower than those in AP group(P<0.05).Conclusion LCP and AP in treatment of closed tibial Pilon fractures have a significant effect,but LCP can reduce the surgical trauma,shorten the operation time and postoperative recovery time,to a cer-tain extent,improve the ankle and lower limb function,and reduce the postoperative fixation fracture heal-ing and other complications.